Real life is one thing, but in fantasy situations…
Where are the folks who love when giants DON’T get consent from their tinies? Giants who fuck with their tinies? Giants who make death threats? Giants who act like the unstoppable forces of nature that they are? Giants who like to cause harm? Who get off on watching their tinies squirming, or watching them gasp in pain? Who love being feared?
Reblog if you’re a fan of G/t dub-con or non-con~
As someone who prefers unwilling vore (and, depending on the situation and characters chosen, fatal) this is par for the course. <3
And I looooove it when the giant is legitimately intimidating to the tiny too YES <3
Put me down as a fan of non-consensual relations between giants and
tinies. To me, what makes giants exciting is that they are totally
without inhibition, at full liberty to indulge any and all of their
desires. Giants get away with everything, and that’s thrilling whether
I’m a giant or just a tiny along for the (possibly fatal) ride.
speaking as an oft-imperiled tiny, protective giants are that much more
precious when most giants are not-so-protective. Gotta have the full
range of dispositions.
@kisupure I find that people into gentle macrophilla type stuff are actually more rare than the harder macrophilia you like, even Pornhub tends to have more cruel macrophilia porn than gentle stuff. I still spend days at a time looking for gentle stuff with no luck. If anything, there seems to be a surplus of the harder stuff and a relative famine of gentle stuff.
Even if you google what non macrophiles think of the kink, they think of it more as domination/submission stuff. To me, that says a lot.
Oh I know – I just wanted a roll call for tumblr since we generally keep to ourselves around here and try not to step on the toes of fluff fans.
Personally, the kind of “hard” I’m into is rarer than both your typical fluff and typical hard combined. Y’know, actual BDSM-style M/x interaction and not just fetish fodder. All the hard stuff is usually impersonal to the point of boring to me, or the cruelty is just over-the-top to the point of camp.
There’s practically no middle-ground between (consensual!!!!) hugs n smooches and like… GTSes shoving buses up their vag. As an actual D/s person, that is not dominance/submission to me. That’s just fetish material.
Also, who said we didn’t like fluff too?
PS- I was there the last time someone “dared” ask where the non-fluff fans were, and it was ugly af. I really don’t give a crap what other people want, or what they think – either learn to coexist or keep it to yourself. Because if those cowards try the shit they pulled on that girl with me, I will rip them a new one.
ALSO. Totally forgot the entire other half of my soapbox:
SFW =/= fluff.
SFW =/= fluff.
SFW =/= FLUFF.
There is A WHOLE WORLD of exciting size difference that isn’t hugs and cuddles and also isn’t sexual.
That is all.
No scene is going to satisfy everyone all the time, and with a niche
this small the loud, intolerant voices are going to have a
disproportionate impact, particularly when many people aren’t totally
secure with their desires. I still think it’s helpful for people to
speak out in support of the full range of their preferences, just as a
reminder that we don’t all have to agree on everything.
perceived need to pick a side between “fluff” and “rough” does tend to
result in extreme scenarios (at both ends of the spectrum) just (one
darkly suspects) to provide a clear contrast to the other camp, which
can be predictably boring.
The same applies to
“sexual” and “non-sexual.” Western society is straight-up terrified of
sex, and we’re always trying to circumscribe our experiences with bright
lines lest we give the impression that our sensualities and affections
are “inappropriate.” Is a giant holding a tiny in the palm of their
hand “sexual” or not?
In all cases, I’d like to see more
pervspeople feel free to explore their desires without getting grief from others.
don’t practice D/s in real life, but I’m coming around to the
realization that size fantasy is where I let my D/s desires play out,
and I’ve found a lot of utility in discussions of size fantasy with
people who either have a prior history with D/s or are still discovering
the implications of their size- and power-role preferences.
the same time, KP, I’m curious about your…dismissal of “just fetish
material.“ "Fetish” is a pretty vague term, and while I imagine you
might disagree, D/s itself could be characterized as a fetish. So what
are the crucial elements for you?
One thing I
have been pleasantly surprised by in G/t Tumblr is the reserves of
creative industry that can turn into a flood once the right enthusiasms
are aligned. People have all sorts of reactions when they come across
something they never knew they might like.
A question, therefore, for everyone: What would you like to see more of in size fantasy?
I wasn’t dismissing it, though I get how it came across – I’m just a very, uh… gruff sort of person. It’s how I talk irl too lol.
By "just” I meant that it doesn’t tend to have that extra layer of interaction that I love so much. It’s a hard quality to describe, but in those infamous words, “I know it when I see it”. I do disagree with you… in my case, at least. D/s is a cornerstone of my current primary relationship (like my marriage was legit on the rocks without it), it is the only reason I have and would again in the future seek out secondary relationships, and I do not get sexually or romantically interested in people unless I can see myself falling in line behind them. It’s just how I operate in the world at large, yannow?
And yeah, the creative synergy is interesting to me, but it personally exhausts me very quickly (as a working artist) so I stay away from it unfortunately.
Anyways, people can like whatever the hell they like (barring direct harm to real people), I do not care one whit. I just want people to extend the same courtesy to me/us.